<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://feeds.qzone.qq.com/rss.xsl" version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:qz="http://qzone.qq.com">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[yan]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[郭琰]]></description>
<link>http://622000337.qzone.qq.com</link>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:58:59 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Qzone</generator>
<language>zh-cn</language>
<copyright>Copyright (C), 2005-2008, Tencent Tech. Co., Ltd.</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:37:05 GMT</pubDate>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[品质考试]]></title>
<link>http://622000337.qzone.qq.com/blog/1214460866</link>
<description><![CDATA[    那是几年前的事了。刚毕业的我到一家大型广告公司应聘。应聘的人很多，我们填了志愿表，说明自己到这家公司打算求什么职位，在这个职位上有什么新的想法和创意等。过了几天，我便接到前去复试的通知。与我同时参加复试的还有俊。我和他选择的岗位都是广告创意，遗憾的是，这个岗位只有一个名额。所以，在领考题时，我的手紧张得有些发抖。 <br>　　在规定时间内，我和俊都按时交了考卷。主考官在收回考卷让主管看过之后，告诉我们，主管现在很忙，正和法国一家广告公司洽谈合作事宜，我们的考卷他就不看了，让我们互相评判一下，以此决定录取。 <br>　　怎么会这样？我扫了俊一眼，心想，我的命运这下就交到他的手里啦。在这种不是我走，就是他走的情况下，我们能做到公正对待彼此的考卷吗﹖ <br>　　就在我心绪不定之际，主考官把俊的考卷交到我手上，然后领我去了另外一个房间。我展开俊的设计，他的作品不由让我暗暗叹服，那明快的画面，简洁的构图，无不透着一种神秘的色彩。我知道，他应该是这家广告公司难以觅得的人才，如果我为了自己而刻意贬低他，那不仅会是这家公司的损失，更是我品德的损失。拿定主意后，我对作品又进行了反复多遍的审视，拿出了自认为最好的评判，并对其不足之处，提出了善意的注解。 <br>　　让我感到意外的是，最后入选的竟是我。事过多天，我才知道，当时公司主管对我俩都很满意，一时难以取舍，便想出了这个主意。正是我对俊的正确评判，让我占据了优势。 <br>　　从那以后，我再也没见到过俊，但我有一句话想对他说，作为一个优秀的人才，看到其他人才的长处，并正确地给予评判，这不仅是一种素质，更是一种难能可贵的品德。让品质占优，绝对不是一句空话，因为相互协作需要品质作保证，团结共进更需要品质作桥梁。]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[智慧人生]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[622000337@qq.com(yan)]]></author>
<comments>http://622000337.qzone.qq.com/blog/1214460866#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://622000337.qzone.qq.com/blog/1214460866</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[投行今年亚太佣金收入大减]]></title>
<link>http://622000337.qzone.qq.com/blog/1209020018</link>
<description><![CDATA[对于投资银行业而言，<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>2007</font>年是它们亚洲业务利润最为丰厚的一年，但今年却开局不利。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>Investment banks have suffered a poor start to the year in Asia after their most profitable year in the region in 2007. </font><br><br>因敢于在市场动荡情况下上市的公司数量减少，投行的股票资本市场收入大幅下降。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>Revenues from equity capital markets have fallen sharply as fewer companies have braved turbulent market conditions to go public.</font><br><br>数据提供商汤姆森金融<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(Thomson Financial)</font>的数据显示，今年截至上周五，在不包括日本在内的亚洲地区，瑞银<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(UBS)</font>、瑞士信贷<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(Credit Suisse)</font>、摩根士丹利<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(Morgan Stanley)</font>和高盛<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(Goldman Sachs)</font>的佣金收入分别下降了<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>44.1%</font>至<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>70.9%</font>。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>UBS, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs saw fees fall between 44.1 per cent and 70.9 per cent in Asia excluding Japan this year up until last Friday, according to Thomson Financial, the data provider. </font><br><br>由于许多公司推迟或取消了首次公开发行<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(IPO)</font>计划，宁愿等待更好的上市时机，投行今年在亚洲面临的市况非常艰难。作为亚洲地区股市表现的衡量指标，摩根士丹利资本国际不包括日本的亚太指数<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(MSCI Asia Pacific ex-Japan index)</font>今年已下跌约<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>18%</font>。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>The region has been a tough market for banks after a large number of companies postponed or cancelled initial public offerings, preferring to wait for better opportunities to sell shares. The MSCI Asia excluding Japan index, a barometer of the region’s stock markets, has fallen about 18 per cent this year. </font><br><br>来自股票和债券资本市场的佣金收入分别下降了<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>15.9%</font>和<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>52.3%</font>。但收购活动仍在继续，亚洲并购交易佣金收入为此增长了<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>3.6%</font>，达到<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>13.8</font>亿美元。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>Fees earned from equity and debt capital markets fell 15.9 per cent and 52.3 per cent respectively. But continued takeover activity saw fees from Asian mergers and acquisitions increase 3.6 per cent to $1.38bn. </font><br><br>在亚洲佣金总收入排行榜上，包括中国铁建<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(China Railway Construction Corp) 54.4</font>亿美元<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>IPO</font>在内的几笔大交易，推动中国中信证券<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(Citic Securities)</font>的排名从去年的第<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>13</font>位上升至第三位。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>China’s Citic Securities rose to third in the league table of overall fee revenues in the region, up from number 13 in 2007, thanks to several large deals including the $5.44bn IPO by China Railway Construction Corp. </font><br><br>瑞银在排行榜上名列榜首，尽管该行今年以来的收入下降了<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>53.3%</font>，从去年的<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>1.71</font>亿美元降至<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>8000</font>万美元。这家瑞士银行近<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>80%</font>的收入来自并购交易佣金。排名第二和第三的分别是花旗集团<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(Citigroup)</font>和中信证券。名列前五的还有美林<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(Merrill Lynch)</font>和<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>JP</font>摩根<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(JPMorgan)</font>。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>UBS topped the league table in spite of a 53.3 per cent plunge in revenues from $171m last year to $80m so far this year. The Swiss bank, which derived nearly 80 per cent of fees from M&amp;A, is followed by Citigroup and Citic. Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan took the other top five places.</font><br><br>中信证券收入飙升<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>425.1%</font>，至<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>5590</font>万美元。在中国铁建本月在香港和上海的<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>IPO</font>中，中信证券都是保荐人。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>Citic, which sponsored both the Hong Kong and Shanghai portions of CRCC’s IPO this month, saw revenues surge 425.1 per cent to $55.9m. </font><br><br>行业咨询公司奥纬咨询<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(Oliver Wyman)</font>的另一份报告显示，作为中国最大的券商之一，中信证券取得成功的背景是：本地公司继续主导着亚洲的承销市场，特别是首次公开发行市场。<font face='' color='' size=''>The success of Citic, one of China’s largest brokerages, comes as local firms continue to dominate the underwriting market in Asia, especially in primary offerings, according to a separate report by Oliver Wyman, an industry consultant.</font><br><br>除了香港和新加坡（国际投行在此仍然控制着市场），其他国家的多数交易往往都由本地券商安排。奥纬咨询称，中国的三大承销商分别是中信证券、中金公司<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(CICC)</font>和国泰君安<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>(Guotai Junan)</font>。台湾<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>5</font>家最大的承销商都是本地公司。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>Apart from Hong Kong and Singapore, where international investment banks still control the market, local brokerages tend to arrange most deals in other countries. China’s top three underwriters are Citic, CICC and Guotai Junan, said Oliver Wyman. All of the five largest players in Taiwan are local firms. </font><br><br>在汤姆森金融排行榜的前十名中，高盛的佣金收入降幅最大，达到<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>70.9%</font>，从<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>9730</font>万美元降至<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>2830</font>万美元。投行业务佣金总收入较上年同期下降<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>5.4%</font>，从<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>22.2</font>亿美元降至<font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>21</font>亿美元。<br><br><font face='' color='' size=''>Among the top 10 in Thomson Financial’s league table, Goldman Sachs’ fees dropped most, by 70.9 per cent from $97.3m to $28.3m. Total investment banking fees fell 5.4 per cent to $2.1bn compared with $2.22bn in the same period last year.</font><br><br>数据包括日本以外亚太地区的并购、股票和债券资本市场及贷款佣金收入。<br><br><font face='Calibri' color='' size=''>The data include fees earned from M&amp;A, equity and debt capital markets and loans in Asia Pacific, excluding Japan.</font><br>]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[622000337@qq.com(yan)]]></author>
<comments>http://622000337.qzone.qq.com/blog/1209020018#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://622000337.qzone.qq.com/blog/1209020018</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

